The clinicopathological features and prognosis of multifocal high-grade gliomas in adults with H3F3A mutation ============================================================================================================= * Yongrui Zhao * Yidong Chen * Leiming Wang * Ying Gao * Jiankun Xu ## Abstract **Objectives:** To explore the clinicopathological features and prognosis of multifocal high-grade gliomas (M-HGGs) with *H3F3A* mutation in adults. **Methods:** Four adult patients with *H3F3A*-mutant M-HGGs who were treated at our institution from August 2020 to December 2021 were reviewed, including clinical, pathological and radiologic data. A series of 16 adult patients with M-HGGs without *H3F3A* mutation was used as a comparative group. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the groups using the Kaplan–Meier method. **Results:** All patients were IDH wild-type and TERT wild-type, and P53 was overexpressed. A patient with the *H3 G34R* mutation and 1 of 3 patients with the *H3 K27 M* mutation had MGMT promoter methylation. The lesions with the *H3 G34R* mutation were located in the cerebral hemisphere; the lesions with *H3 K27* alterations were mainly in the midline structure, and the cerebral hemisphere could also be involved. One patient underwent subtotal resection (STR), and 3 patients underwent biopsy. All patients received radiotherapy, and the median PFS and OS were 9.5 months and 14.5 months, respectively. The clinical outcomes were similar to those of non-*H3F3A*-mutated M-HGGs patients (median PFS and OS were 7.0 months and 18.0 months, respectively). **Conclusion:** We describe the clinicopathological features and outcomes of 4 adult M-HGGs patients with *H3F3A* mutation, and found this mutation doesn’t appear to have a negative outcome with the administration of current therapies. **I**n recent years, the mutations of a regulatory histone *H3F3A*, including *H3 K27 M* and *H3 G34R/V* mutations, have been found to be an important genetic driver of high-grade glioma, especially in children and adolescents.1-2 The biological behavior of high-grade glioma with *H3F3A* mutation often shows a diffuse infiltrative growth pattern. Previous reports revealed that *H3 K27 M*-mutant glioma commonly occurs in the midline structure,3 while *H3 G34*-mutant glioma is predominantly found in the supratentorial nonmidline structure.4 The mutation rate of *H3 G34* is lower than that of *H3 K27 M*, and they are mutually exclusive, and exclusive from IDH-mutant cases.4-5 According to the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of CNS tumors, pediatric-type diffuse high-grade gliomas are named “Diffuse midline glioma, *H3 K27*-altered” and “Diffuse hemispheric glioma, *H3 G34*-mutant”.6 However, the *H3F3A* mutation in adult-type diffuse gliomas is still not fully understood. Multifocal high-grade gliomas (M-HGGs) are a subtype of malignant glioma with a worse prognosis than solitary high-grade glioma.7-8 M-HGGs with *H3F3A* mutations are rare. This study retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological features and outcomes of M-HGGs with *H3F3A* mutation in adults to gain insight into the understanding of high-grade gliomas with *H3F3A* mutation. ## Methods We retrospectively analyzed 4 adult patients with *H3F3A*-mutant M-HGGs who underwent radiotherapy at Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University from August 2020 to December 2021. A series of 16 adult patients with M-HGGs without *H3F3A* mutation was used as a comparative group. Cases with solitary high-grade glioma were excluded. The patients underwent at least 6 months of postoperative follow-up. The cases were classified according to the 2016 WHO classification of CNS tumors.9 The M-HGGs are defined as 2 or more lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The clinical, radiologic and pathological data were reviewed. This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University. The extent of resection was classified as gross total resection (GTR), subtotal resection (STR), and biopsy. Postoperative radiotherapy was performed with the volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique based on the recommendations for high-grade glioma target delineation in the 2020 version of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Chemotherapy was given using the Stupp protocol. Histological pathology is the result of hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and immunohistochemical staining, and antibodies are routinely detected, including IDH1, P53, Ki-67, and H3 K27 M. H3 G34R/V was partially detected. The molecular data included IDH1/2, TERT, MGMT promoter methylation, and partial H3 G34 or H3 K27 detection. Mutational analysis of IDH1/2, H3 G34 and H3 K27 was performed using polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. MGMT promoter methylation was assessed by pyrosequencing. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from surgery to progression. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from surgery to death from any cause or to the date of the last visit. Follow-up was mainly performed through outpatient and telephone visits. Clinical characteristics were described using descriptive statistics, while survival analysis comprised the median PFS estimation, the median OS estimation, the Kaplan–Meier curve, and the log-rank test using GraphPad Prism.9 A *p*-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. ## Results ### Patient characteristics The median age of adult patients with the *H3F3A*-mutated M-HGGs was 36 years old (range, 27-65 years), including 2 males and 2 females (Table 1). Headache was the most common clinical symptom, without seizure. All patients underwent surgery, including 1 with STR and 3 with biopsy. Two patients received concomitant radiochemotherapy, another 2 patients received radiotherapy alone, and one patient received tumor-treating fields after radiotherapy. View this table: [Table 1](http://nsj.org.sa/content/28/1/42/T1) Table 1 - Characteristics of 4 patients with *H3F3A*-mutant M-HGGs. ### Imaging characteristics The imaging characteristics of *H3F3A*-mutant M-HGGs are shown in Figure 1-4.1-4 According to the MRI results, three patients had 2 lesions, and the lesions were found on the right side of the brain with enhancement. In another patient, 3 lesions in the bilateral brain showed no enhancement. The location of the lesions in one patient was in the midline structure, that of another patient was in the cerebral hemisphere, and both the cerebral hemisphere and midline structure were involved in another 2 patients. ![Figure 1](http://nsj.org.sa/https://nsj.org.sa/content/nsj/28/1/42/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1](http://nsj.org.sa/content/28/1/42/F1) Figure 1 - Radiographic features of case 1. Contrast-enhanced MRI shows 2 lesions in the right frontal-temporal (**A**) and right parietal lobes (**B**). ![Figure 2](http://nsj.org.sa/https://nsj.org.sa/content/nsj/28/1/42/F2.medium.gif) [Figure 2](http://nsj.org.sa/content/28/1/42/F2) Figure 2 - Radiographic features of case 2. T1-weighted image shows 2 lesions located in the right basal ganglia and right thalamus (**A**), with obvious inhomogeneous enhancement on enhanced scans (**B**). ![Figure 3](http://nsj.org.sa/https://nsj.org.sa/content/nsj/28/1/42/F3.medium.gif) [Figure 3](http://nsj.org.sa/content/28/1/42/F3) Figure 3 - Radiographic features of case 3. The lesion was unevenly enhanced on contrast-enhanced MRI. The FLAIR image shows multiple lesions in the left frontal lobe, bilateral thalamus (**A**), and right frontal lobe (**B**), and the lesions are not enhanced (**C**). ![Figure 4](http://nsj.org.sa/https://nsj.org.sa/content/nsj/28/1/42/F4.medium.gif) [Figure 4](http://nsj.org.sa/content/28/1/42/F4) Figure 4 - Radiographic features of case 4. The T2-weighted image shows that the lesion was located in the right basal ganglia, involving the thalamus (**A**), and the FLAIR image shows that another lesion was located in the right temporal lobe (**B**). Contrast-enhanced MRI shows that the lesion was enhanced in the right basal ganglia (**C**). ### Pathological features Histopathological immunohistochemistry showed that P53 was overexpressed in 4 patients, and IDH1 was positive in one patient but negative in next-generation sequencing (NGS). The H3.3 histone test showed that one patient was *H3 G34R* positive, and 3 patients were *H3 K27 M* positive. The Ki-67 index was between 15% and 50% in *H3 K27*-altered patients, and the Ki-67 proliferation rate was up to 80% in H3 *G34*-mutant patients. The molecular data are shown in Table 1. None of the 4 patients had *IDH* mutations or *TERT* mutations. Two patients had MGMT promoter methylation, including 1 patient with the *H3 G34R* mutation and 1 patient with the *H3 K27 M* mutation. The mutational analysis findings of histone H3.3 were consistent with the immunohistochemical results. ### Follow-up and outcomes All patients passed away at the last follow-up. Two patients with *H3 K27* alterations had local recurrence; other 2 patients (one with *H3 K27* alteration, one with *H3 G34R* mutation) experienced distant brain progression. The median PFS and OS were 9.5 months and 14.5 months, respectively. The clinical outcomes of patients with *H3F3A*-mutant M-HGGs were compared to those of 16 M-HGGs patients without *H3F3A* mutations treated at the same time. In the control group, 1 patient had an *IDH1* mutation, and 4 of 16 patients had MGMT promoter methylation. The median PFS and OS of patients without *H3F3A* mutation were 7.0 months and 18.0 months, respectively. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (Figure 5). ![Figure 5](http://nsj.org.sa/https://nsj.org.sa/content/nsj/28/1/42/F5.medium.gif) [Figure 5](http://nsj.org.sa/content/28/1/42/F5) Figure 5 - Kaplan–Meier survival curve. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log-rank tests for PFS (**A**) and OS (**B**). The median PFS and OS were 9.5 months and 14.5 months, respectively, in M-HGGs patients with *H3F3A* mutations. For non-*H3F3A*-mutated M-HGGs patients, the median PFS and OS were 7.0 months and 18.0 months, respectively. Comparisons between the 2 groups using the log-rank test indicated no significant difference. ## Discussion To date, an increasing number of *H3F3A*-mutant high-grade gliomas have been reported, yet *M-HGGs* with *H3F3A* mutations are rare. It is not clear whether multifocal gliomas represent a unique biological variation or whether multifocal gliomas are an inevitable process in the natural history of high-grade glioma.10 Previous studies have shown that the incidence of M-HGGs is approximately 0.5%-35%,11 but the incidence of M-HGGs with *H3F3A* mutation is unknown. In this study, we describe the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of 4 adult M-HGGs patients with *H3F3A* mutation, including one with *H3 G34R* mutation and 3 with *H3 K27* alteration. High-grade glioma with the histone *H3* mutation tends to occur in children but also in adolescents or young patients, most of whom are younger than 30 years.12-13 The prognosis of *H3F3A*-mutant glioma has been reported with varying results in children and adults.3-4,14-16 Vuong et al. showed that the prognosis of *H3 K27 M* mutation is influenced by patient age and that the pediatric group has a favorable prognosis.12 Tumors with the *H3 G34* mutation were consistently located within the cerebral hemisphere and frequently invaded the parietal and temporal lobes.4 Interestingly, *H3 K27 M*-mutant diffuse midline gliomas in adults mainly involved the thalamus and spinal cord.3 However, in pediatric patients, the brainstem is the most common location of tumors harboring the *H3 K27 M* mutation.13 In the present case series, the radiological characteristics of adult *H3F3A*-mutant gliomas are consistent with those reported in previous studies. The lesions of *H3 G34R*-mutant patients were located in the frontal, parietal and temporal lobes. Three patients with *H3 K27* alterations had lesions involving the thalamus, and 2 patients had lesions affecting the basal ganglia. As previously reported, the *H3F3A* mutation was exclusive to IDH mutations and TERT promoter mutations.5,17 *H3 G34*-mutant gliomas were associated with MGMT promoter methylation in most patients, which is also one of the reasons for its better prognosis.15 Our data showed that 4 patients were IDH wild-type and TERT wild-type; P53 was overexpressed in all patients; and the patient with the *H3 G34R* mutation and 1 of 3 patients with the *H3 K27 M* mutation had MGMT promoter methylation. The PFS was better than that in patients with MGMT promoter unmethylation. Although case reports of M-HGGs with H3F3A mutation have been published, few studies have reported the outcome. Lim et al18 and Wang Q et al19 reported one patient with multifocal *H3 K27 M*-mutant diffuse midline glioma respectively, but the final survival outcome was not obtained.18-19 Yekula et al20 reported one adult *H3 K27 M*-mutant diffuse midline glioma with a gliomatosis cerebri growth pattern, and the OS was 8 months. Schulte et al reported *H3 K27 M*-mutant multifocal gliomas in 2 of 60 adult patients with diffuse midline glioma. The median PFS was 9.6 months and the OS was 27.6 months in this adult cohort.21 Vettermann et al22 reported 2 patients with *H3 G34*-mutant multifocal gliomas without an outcome or molecular profile.22 In our series, the median PFS and OS of all 4 patients were 9.5 months and 14.5 months, respectively. The clinical outcomes were similar to those of non-H3F3A-mutated M-HGGs patients. At present, there is no standard treatment for M-HGGs, and the commonly used treatment modalities include surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. There were 3 *H3 K27*-altered patients with biopsy and one *H3 G34*-mutant patient with STR; all 4 patients received radiotherapy, and 2 patients received temozolomide during this study. The recurrence pattern of *M-HGGs* in adults with *H3F3A* mutation was similar to that of high-grade glioma: 2 patients had local recurrence, and 2 patients had distant brain lesions with diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement. There have also been reports of high-grade glioma with the *H3F3A* mutation with extraneural metastasis.23-25 The most common sites of distant metastasis are the osseous and peritoneal regions. Mohiuddin et al. reported three cases of high-grade glioma with *H3F3A* mutation and diffuse extraneural dissemination in young adulthood (age range: 10-25 years).25 However, extraneural metastasis in adults with *H3F3A*-mutant glioma has not been reported. The patient with the *H3 G34R* mutation in our study experienced gastrointestinal bleeding after recurrence of the disease, but an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan showed no obvious abnormalities, and the patient died less than a month after the onset of intestinal bleeding. The main limitation of this study is the small number of patients due to the rarity of *M-HGGs* with *H3F3A* mutations. Moreover, the patients did not receive salvage treatment, such as reirradiation or systemic treatment, after disease progression because of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and personal reasons. This may affected the overall prognosis of the patients to some extent, and the patients died soon after recurrence. In Conclusion, The *H3F3A*-mutant glioma mainly affects the pediatric population but can also occur in adults. In this study, we analyzed a case series of *M-HGGs* with *H3F3A* mutation in adults, including clinical, radiological, pathology, and outcome data. This disease entity may rarely be present in the clinic and has a complicated, multifactorial etiology that has not yet been fully described. Even so, current treatments may lead to a satisfactory prognosis. More clinical studies are needed to further investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of *H3F3A*-mutant *M-HGGs* in adults. ## Acknowledgment *We acknowledge the work of our colleagues at the Radiology Department in offering the original images and data related to this article. We acknowledge the neurosurgeons for their special contributions to these cases.* ## Footnotes * **Disclosure.** Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company. * Received July 8, 2022. * Accepted November 23, 2022. * Copyright: © Neurosciences Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. ## References 1. 1.Wu G, Broniscer A, McEachron TA, Lu C, Paugh BS, Becksfort J, et al. Somatic histone H3 alterations in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas and non-brainstem glioblastomas. Nat Genet 2012; 44: 251-253. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ng.1102&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22286216&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F28%2F1%2F42.atom) 2. 2.Roux A, Pallud J, Saffroy R, Edjlali-Goujon M, Debily MA, Boddaert N, et al. High-grade gliomas in adolescents and young adults highlight histomolecular differences from their adult and pediatric counterparts. Neuro Oncol 2020; 22: 1190-1202. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/neuonc/noaa024&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32025728&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F28%2F1%2F42.atom) 3. 3.Meyronet D, Esteban-Mader M, Bonnet C, Joly MO, Uro-Coste E, Amiel-Benouaich A, et al. Characteristics of H3 K27M-mutant gliomas in adults. Neuro Oncol 2017; 19: 1127-1134. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/neuonc/now274&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28201752&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F28%2F1%2F42.atom) 4. 4.Picart T, Barritault M, Poncet D, Berner LP, Izquierdo C, Tabouret E, et al. Characteristics of diffuse hemispheric gliomas, H3 G34-mutant in adults. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3: 1-12. 5. 5.Sturm D, Witt H, Hovestadt V, Khuong-Quang DA, Jones DT, Konermann C, et al. Hotspot mutations in H3F3A and IDH1 define distinct epigenetic and biological subgroups of glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 2012; 22: 425-437. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ccr.2012.08.024&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23079654&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F28%2F1%2F42.atom) [Web of Science](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000310113900005&link_type=ISI) 6. 6.Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D, et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23: 1231-1251. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/neuonc/noab106&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34185076&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F28%2F1%2F42.atom) 7. 7.Haque W, Thong Y, Verma V, Rostomily R, Brian Butler E, Teh BS. Patterns of management and outcomes of unifocal versus multifocal glioblastoma. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 74: 155-159. 8. 8.Di Carlo DT, Cagnazzo F, Benedetto N, Morganti R, Perrini P. Multiple high-grade gliomas: epidemiology, management, and outcome. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2019; 42: 263-275. 9. 9.Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. (Berl.) 2016; 131: 803-820. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27157931&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F28%2F1%2F42.atom) 10. 10.Paulsson AK, Holmes JA, Peiffer AM, Miller LD, Liu W, Xu J, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes and genomic characteristics of single focus and multifocal glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2014; 119: 429-435. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11060-014-1515-1&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24990827&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F28%2F1%2F42.atom) 11. 11.Thomas RP, Xu LW, Lober RM, Li G, Nagpal S. The incidence and significance of multiple lesions in glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2013; 112: 91-97. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11060-012-1030-1&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23354652&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F28%2F1%2F42.atom) 12. 12.Vuong HG, Ngo TNM, Le HT, et al. The prognostic significance of HIST1H3B/C and H3F3A K27M mutations in diffuse midline gliomas is influenced by patient age. J Neurooncol 2022; 158: 405-412. 13. 13.López-Pérez CA, Franco-Mojica X, Villanueva-Gaona R, Díaz-Alba A, Rodríguez-Florido MA, Navarro VG. Adult diffuse midline gliomas H3 K27-altered: review of a redefined entity. J Neurooncol 2022; 158: 369-378. 14. 14.Wang L, Shao L, Li H, Yao K, Duan Z, Zhi C, et al. Histone H3.3 G34-mutant Diffuse Gliomas in Adults. Am J Surg Pathol 2022; 46: 249-257. 15. 15.Korshunov A, Capper D, Reuss D, Schrimpf D, Ryzhova M, Hovestadt V, et al. Histologically distinct neuroepithelial tumors with histone 3 G34 mutation are molecularly similar and comprise a single nosologic entity. Acta Neuropathol 2016; 131: 137-146. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00401-015-1493-1&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F28%2F1%2F42.atom) 16. 16.Wang L, Li Z, Zhang M, Piao Y, Chen L, Liang H, et al. H3 K27M-mutant diffuse midline gliomas in different anatomical locations. Hum Pathol 2018; 78: 89-96. 17. 17.Louis DN, Wesseling P, Aldape K, Brat DJ, Capper D, Cree IA, et al. cIMPACT-NOW update 6: new entity and diagnostic principle recommendations of the cIMPACT-Utrecht meeting on future CNS tumor classification and grading. Brain Pathol 2020; 30: 844-856. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/bpa.12832&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32307792&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F28%2F1%2F42.atom) 18. 18.Lim JX, Leong A, Tan AP, Tan CL, Nga VDW. H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma presenting as synchronous lesions involving pineal and suprasellar region: A case report and literature review. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 81: 144-148. 19. 19.Wang Q, Niu W, Pan H. Targeted therapy with anlotinib for a H3K27M mutation diffuse midline glioma patient with PDGFR-α mutation: a case report. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022; 164: 2063-2066. 20. 20.Yekula A, Gupta M, Coley N, Sang U H. Adult H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma with gliomatosis cerebri growth pattern: Case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2020; 68: 124-128. [CrossRef](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.02.046&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://nsj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32145563&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fnsj%2F28%2F1%2F42.atom) 21. 21.Schulte JD, Buerki RA, Lapointe S, Molinaro AM, Zhang Y, Villanueva-Meyer JE, et al. Clinical, radiologic, and genetic characteristics of histone H3 K27M-mutant diffuse midline gliomas in adults. Neurooncol Adv 2020; 2: 1-10. 22. 22.Vettermann FJ, Felsberg J, Reifenberger G, Hasselblatt M, Forbrig R, Berding G, et al. Characterization of Diffuse Gliomas With Histone H3-G34 Mutation by MRI and Dynamic 18F-FET PET. Clin Nucl Med 2018; 43: 895-898. 23. 23.Kay MD, Pariury HE, Perry A, Winegar BA, Kuo PH. Extracranial Metastases From Glioblastoma With Primitive Neuronal Components on FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 2020; 45: e162-e164. 24. 24.Jethanandani A, Gule-Monroe MK, Chen M, Johnson JM. Extraneural Metastases From a High-Grade Glioma (HGG) With an H3F3A G34R Mutation. Front Oncol 2019; 9: 373. 25. 25.Mohiuddin S, Maraka S, Usman Baig M, Gupta S, Muzzafar T, Valyi-Nagy T, et al. Case series of diffuse extraneural metastasis in H3F3A mutant high-grade gliomas: Clinical, molecular phenotype and literature review. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 89: 405-411.